NDAA update · Oct 22, 2026

NDAA Update Oct 22, 2026: Pentagon, Lockheed Agree on 10-Year Framework for F-35

Five stories on Oct. 22: Air & Space Forces Magazine's Stephen Losey on a Pentagon-Lockheed 10-year F-35 framework agreement (lots 21 through 30) that remains subject to congressional authorization and appropriations in the FY2027 defense policy bill, The Center Square's Brett Rowland on the Department of War announcing that framework for at least 850 F-35s without disclosing a price, with a CBO estimate of 425 jets from FY2027 through FY2031 at $61.4 billion and Senate Armed Services multiyear-contract authority in the FY2027 bill, The Washington Sun's Al Weaver and Kadia Goba on Republican leaders' lame-duck plans to fund the government, address the debt ceiling and push through a must-pass defense authorization bill, with Section 702 of FISA possibly attached to the NDAA, SOFX Editor Staff on an Oct. 21 Project Agincourt memorandum from Owen West and Navy SEAL Senior Chief Max Strasiser targeting Oct. 1, 2027 to stand up a four-star Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), with Senate Armed Services Section 917 of the FY2027 NDAA permitting a Senate-only Robotic and Autonomous Systems Combatant Command, and the Steel Manufacturers Association and other American steel-industry organizations sending a letter to congressional leadership urging inclusion of bipartisan shipbuilding language, including pro-shipbuilding policies proposed in the SHIPS for America Act, in the final FY2027 NDAA.

Bill status

No change in the bill's status: the House passed H.R. 8800 on July 22, 2026; S. 4784 has not reached the Senate floor; and the Senate is scheduled to return the week of November 9, after the November 3 election, with the NDAA deferred to the lame-duck session. Full timeline: FY2027 NDAA status · Did the NDAA pass? · NDAA 2027 status · What happens next.

The stories

Pentagon, Lockheed Agree on 10-Year Framework for F-35

Air & Space Forces Magazine · Oct 22, 2026

Stephen Losey reports that the Pentagon and Lockheed Martin on Oct. 22 announced a framework agreement to buy F-35s for the next 10 years (lots 21 through 30), with Lockheed building 156 jets per year for U.S. and international customers and the U.S. military buying at least 850 of those 1,560 aircraft, plus initial spares, modification kits and global fleet sustainment. Pricing, schedules and variant splits are not yet set. Lockheed agreed to invest at least $7 billion of its own money. The Pentagon's statement says executing the agreement "remains subject to congressional authorization and appropriations." The article says Congress is currently considering granting the Pentagon authority to enter into multiyear procurement contracts for the F-35 and F-15EX as part of its work on the 2027 defense policy bill, and that lawmakers have yet to pass a FY2027 budget, so the agreement is unfunded and only a framework. Lockheed said that if Congress grants multiyear authority and appropriations in the next few months, it will finalize contract terms with the F-35 Joint Program Office through a formal award. Under Secretary Michael Duffey: "We have fundamentally changed how we stabilize the American defense industrial base to produce at speed and scale." Lockheed CEO Jim Taiclet: "This multiyear framework strengthens the way we can plan and invest in the F-35 enterprise."

Republicans Have Big Post-Election Plans - And Big Fears About What's Doable

The Washington Sun · Oct 22, 2026

Al Weaver and Kadia Goba report that Republican leaders plan to use the post-election lame-duck period to fund the government, address the debt ceiling and push through a must-pass defense authorization bill. Passing the annual National Defense Authorization Act is top of mind, and multiple sources do not sense much consternation on that front. Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which expired in June, could get attached to the NDAA. The article also covers GOP debate over a third, defense-focused reconciliation bill: Sen. Bernie Moreno said "We will do a reconciliation bill. One way or the other"; Sen. Shelley Moore Capito was skeptical; and a senior GOP aide said a defense supplemental likely lacks calendar time. Priorities depend on the Nov. 3 midterm results.

Pentagon announces 10-year F-35 deal without disclosing a price

The Center Square · Oct 22, 2026

Brett Rowland reports that the Department of War announced a 10-year framework Thursday to buy at least 850 F-35s (Lots 21-30, initial spare parts, 10 years of modification kits, and sustainment of the global F-35 fleet) without disclosing a price; neither the department nor Lockheed Martin released a value, and both said the deal depends on congressional authorization and appropriations that have not yet happened. Lockheed said the deal establishes a framework, not the final procurement contract. The Senate Armed Services Committee's version of the fiscal 2027 defense authorization bill would let the department enter multiyear F-35 contracts. CBO estimated Sept. 28 that the department plans to buy 425 F-35s from fiscal 2027 through 2031 at $61.4 billion, or about 85 aircraft a year. Under federal law, a multiyear procurement contract costing more than $500 million must be specifically authorized in both an authorization act and an appropriations act. Lockheed will self-fund at least $7 billion in initiatives; GAO reported in June that the F-35 Joint Program Office is relying on the private sector to deliver more than $7 billion in additional parts through fiscal 2031, and neither the department nor the company said whether those are the same funds. GAO reported in September 2025 that 156 aircraft per year is the program's maximum capacity, and that the contractor delivered 110 aircraft in 2024, all of them late by an average of 238 days. GAO reported in June that the share of time F-35s could perform at least one assigned mission fell from 67% in fiscal 2021 to 44% in fiscal 2025, and that the full mission capable rate fell from 38% to 25%; lifetime sustainment costs for U.S. aircraft were estimated at $1.6 trillion. The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers urged Congress to authorize the arrangement, citing program estimates of $9 billion to $10 billion in savings over the decade. Under Secretary of War Michael P. Duffey said the framework works "by aligning financial incentives with actual performance."

Pentagon Ties Proposed Autonomous Warfare Command to Real-World Combat Results

SOFX · Oct 22, 2026

SOFX Editor Staff reports that an Oct. 21 memorandum from Project Agincourt leaders Owen West (chief executive) and Navy SEAL Senior Chief Max Strasiser set Oct. 1, 2027 as the target to stand up a four-star Autonomous Warfare Command (AUTOWARCOM), with combat performance, competitions and exercises deciding which unmanned systems scale. "Every auditable dollar we spend should reduce cost-per-kill or risk-to-force." "These new systems will not be declared ready on paper." The command cannot be created by directive alone: a functional combatant command needs congressional legislation for its budget and acquisition authorities and a Senate-confirmed commander; the memo directs the unmanned systems office to work with Congress. Section 917 of the Senate Armed Services Committee's FY2027 NDAA (advanced on an 18-9 vote) would permit a Robotic and Autonomous Systems Combatant Command led by a four-star officer, with test and limited acquisition authorities; the provision is Senate-only. It would be the first new combatant command since U.S. Space Command was reestablished in 2019. David Deptula (Mitchell Institute) has argued a combatant command risks centralizing control. The FY2027 budget request seeks about $54.6 billion for the Defense Autonomous Warfare Group. Project Agincourt's initial implementation plan is expected by late October, and House and Senate negotiators must reconcile their NDAA versions before any autonomous-systems command becomes law.

SMA Backs Bipartisan Shipbuilding Language, Urges Inclusion in FY2027 NDAA

Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA) · Oct 22, 2026

SMA and other American steel-industry organizations sent a letter to congressional leadership urging inclusion of bipartisan shipbuilding language, including pro-shipbuilding policies proposed in the SHIPS for America Act, in the final FY2027 NDAA. They say American steel mills supply the material for civil and military fleets, "American ships mean American steel," and "The NDAA is the right vehicle to move this language forward."

Get these by email: sign up for free NDAA alerts.